Last winter a client asked me to survey a small ten acre woodlot that was behind his farm that was being offered to him. I visited the town hall and examined the tax maps and tax assessment records. The tax map showed an “L” shaped lot and listed it as 20 acres. I shrugged knowing that the local tax assessor was not a land surveyor and tax maps are hardly definitive sources of boundary location.
During my research I unearthed a lot of old surveys for the surrounding areas. This is generally a good thing because it means that I am headed down a well trodden trail as far as the research goes and the old survey plans will have valuable clues as to where the bounds of my client’s land is. As I pieced together these older surveys the void did indeed point toward an “L” shaped lot being some 20 to 25 acres. This was curious because the deed clearly described a rectangular lot of 10 acres.
What was even more curious was that the old surveys showed the land being owned variously by people who did not appear in the deed chain. My clients own deed to the farm which abutted the “locus” – the lot I was surveying – was particularly unhelpful being the “homestead farm” of Muddy Plow field. No metes and bounds, no mention of abutters, nothing except that.
What did old Muddy own anyway? My client took me out to the back of his farm and pointed to a stone wall that. Digging further in the deed chain found that Muddy had inherited the farm from his great grandfather Stony Plowfield and Stony’s deed described the farm as ending at the stone wall. Yet, some how, the 10 acre lot and the farm did not fit together and there were no clues as to why everyone thought that this lot was “L” shaped. Whenever I am faced with puzzling deed descriptions and uncertain deed chains, it’s time to go fishing.
By fishing I mean scanning deeds by name of owner and reading their descriptions. This sort of research is a black hole of billable hours. I should say at this point that our system of land records is extremely inefficient. Land is recorded under the owner’s name. There is not requirement that deeds actually be recorded or that deeds clearly describe the land. What is stranger is that deeds are not considered proof of ownership, merely evidence of ownership. Imagine if cars were bought, owned and sold in this manner! I informed my client before I went any further and let him know that this research was going to take a bit more time that I reckoned. He gave me the green light and I went ahead with my fishing expedition.
I started with Stony since he had the clearest description yet. He owned many parcels during his life actively buying and selling woodlots all over town. Most of these deeds read like this “North by land of Smith, West by land of Jones, South by land of Johnson, and East by land of Brown being X acres.” I drew a diagram of each one of these deeds and laid them out like a big jigsaw puzzle. And began to eliminate deeds that described lots that somehow did not fit the locus and keep the deeds that mentioned lands owned by abutters in the deed chains I knew of around the locus. A few of these deeds were tantalizing in that they mentioned Muddy as an abutter.
I looked at these deeds more closely and things began to fall into place. Apparently Muddy had bought a lot that abutted his farmstead along the stone wall. Then be bought another lot that abutted that lot to the south. Then some one else bought a 10 acre lot that abutter that last lot on the east. The three lots together formed the “L” shaped lot. Apparently, the two woodlots were forgotten by Muddy’s heirs and successors over the years thinking their property ended at the stone wall as described in Stony’s deed..
So my client ended up buying the 10 acres his 10 acres and reclaiming the two lots that had long been forgotten. It’s always nice to unravel a mystery in favor of the client.